Tổng hợp nghiên cứu về Tội phạm
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(249)
-
▼
April
(68)
- [NFPC] Puzzle #1: Ann’s Bad AIM
- Trở thành nhà điều tra tội phạm máy tính
- [Skill] Network Forensics Puzzle Contest
- [Bình luận] Điều 224, 225, 226, 226a, 226b Bộ Luật...
- [Avast] Another nasty trick in malicious PDF
- [[IC3] The Dangerous Side of Online Romance Scams
- [RAT] Công cụ dành cho Điều tra tội phạm máy tính
- China's Baidu Rips Off Copyrighted Content, Fined ...
- Sony admits complete failure of PSN Security
- [Tài liệu] Fraud Alert Involving Unauthorized Wire...
- [Lượm] PowerPoint 2003 hotfix package 26/4/2011
- [RAT] Hỗn độn secuiry Linh tinh :))
- [RAT] Hỗn độn secuiry Linh tinh :))
- [Video] an ninh mạng Việt Nam 2010
- [Video] an ninh mạng Việt Nam 2010
- CSI Computer Crime and Security Survey Archiv...
- No title
- [NDT] Báo điện tử Nguoiduatin.vn bị DOS
- [NDT] Báo điện tử Nguoiduatin.vn bị DOS
- [Lượm] Computer forensic tool
- [Lượm] Computer forensic tool
- [KAS lab] Spam report: March 2011
- [KAS lab] Spam report: March 2011
- [VNN] Người dùng bị xâm hại, web hò hẹn ra tòa
- [VNN] Người dùng bị xâm hại, web hò hẹn ra tòa
- [Lượm] Blogger Follow Us J-Query Widget - abt
- [Lượm] Blogger Follow Us J-Query Widget - abt
- PlayStation_Network [at] playstation-email [dot] com
- [HVAonline] Thảo luận việc định hướng
- [HVAonline] Thảo luận việc định hướng
- [white book 2010] Viet nam Information and Communi...
- [white book 2010] Viet nam Information and Communi...
- [Panda Security] Quarterly Report PandaLabs (Janua...
- [Panda Security] Quarterly Report PandaLabs (Janua...
- [Vef.vn] Biệt thự ngoại thành: Cửa đầu tư mới
- [Vef.vn] Biệt thự ngoại thành: Cửa đầu tư mới
- [Zone-h] Defacements Statistics 2010 -Almost 1,5 m...
- [Zone-h] Defacements Statistics 2010 -Almost 1,5 m...
- [Tài liệu] Ngày an toàn thông tin Việt Nam năm 2010
- [Tài liệu] Ngày an toàn thông tin Việt Nam năm 2010
- [RAT] VNcert.gov.vn - hệ thống khảo sát trực tuyến
- [RAT] VNcert.gov.vn - hệ thống khảo sát trực tuyến
- [RAT] STRUCTURE OF HIGHTECH CRIME DEPARTMENT
- [RAT] STRUCTURE OF HIGHTECH CRIME DEPARTMENT
- [Pen code 2009] Computer crime law in Viet Nam
- [Pen code 2009] Computer crime law in Viet Nam
- [RAT] Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices & Challe...
- [RAT] Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices & Challe...
- [Video] Tội phạm CNC ở Việt Nam - Thực trạng và gi...
- [Video] Tội phạm CNC ở Việt Nam - Thực trạng và gi...
- Sự kiện CNTT Việt Nam tiêu biểu hàng năm
- Sự kiện CNTT Việt Nam tiêu biểu hàng năm
- [Tài liệu] SecurityWorld 2011 - BẢO ĐẢM AN NINH CỦ...
- [Tài liệu] SecurityWorld 2011 - BẢO ĐẢM AN NINH CỦ...
- [Lượm] SEO flavor by country - a definitive list
- [Lượm] SEO flavor by country - a definitive list
- [About me] 9 nguyên tắc vàng trong lúc "Nước sôi, ...
- [About me] 9 nguyên tắc vàng trong lúc "Nước sôi, ...
- [Lượm] New Tự động update từ Blogger lên Twitter F...
- [Lượm] New Tự động update từ Blogger lên Twitter F...
- [Lượm] Slide In Image Captions for Blogger
- [Lượm] Slide In Image Captions for Blogger
- [Lượm] Tạo banner quảng cáo sitelink
- [Lượm] Tạo banner quảng cáo sitelink
- [Sách] Tội phạm trong lĩnh vực Công nghệ thông tin
- [Sách] Tội phạm trong lĩnh vực Công nghệ thông tin
- Khái niệm đặc điểm tội phạm Công nghệ thông tin
- Khái niệm đặc điểm tội phạm Công nghệ thông tin
-
▼
April
(68)
Powered by Blogger.
Baidu, China's most popular search engine, has just been found guilty--in China--for violating copyright on music lyrics found on its service. But this is China, home of dodgy thinking about intellectual property: The fine was just $8,000.
The case centers on 50 tracks owned by China's MCSC record label, the lyrics of which Baidu was making available through its MP3 lyrics search system. MCSC contended Baidu didn't have the rights to do this, and took the search engine to court. A judge in the Haidian district of Beijing has just examined the case, and ruled in favor of MCSC.
The penalty is to remove the offending content--a pretty standard move, of course--and pay compensation. The amount is laughable though: It's just 50,000 Yuan or $7,300, and another 10,000 Yuan in court fees. Arguably the matter concerns just 50 tracks, and the content in question is merely the lyrics. But that MCSC-owned IP will have been served up by Baidu to potentially millions of users, magnifying the issue somewhat. Though we're not talking about serious music pirating here, it does seem somewhat ridiculous that such a small penalty has been levied against a big-business search engine.
$8,000-odd dollars seems even more ridiculous when you look at the size of fines enforced in the U.S. for piracy--the most obvious counter example being the ruling against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who faced a $2.4 million fine for pirating just 24 music tracks.
But, the Baidu ruling has a bigger, slightly iconic significance. Though there are some legal shenanigans behind the case, it demonstrates that serious questions of IP violation can be successfully tried in China. The nation is absolutely notorious for rampant theft of IP, be it gadget design, look and feel of Web sites, imagery, and code--in 2007, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative added China to its "priority watch list" for widespread violation of copyright. Though nobody's suggesting that the Baidu case means that the legal establishment has turned a corner, and copyright will be viewed with a new respect, it may be seen as a test case, with seriously positive implications for other rights holders who've seen their creations stolen inside China. Chinese e-publishers recently planning to sue Baidu for copyright violations will also be watching this ruling closely.
Source: http://www.fastcompany.com
0 comments to "China's Baidu Rips Off Copyrighted Content, Fined Just a Tiny Bit"
Post a Comment